The UAE’s core AML law was replaced in October 2025 — Federal Decree-Law No. 10 of 2025 superseded Federal Decree-Law 20 of 2018. So any AML/CFT policy still built on 20/2018 (or the long-repealed Cabinet Decision 58/2020 and 53/2021) is out of date and an easy MOE inspection finding. The other frequent failures: applying CDD only to higher-risk customers, using the wrong CDD scope for real estate brokers, a mythical PEP “sunset”, and an unnamed MLRO. Fastlane drafts or refreshes your AML policy to the current framework from AED 999 + VAT.
Regulators don’t just want an AML policy — they want a current, accurate, activity-specific one that matches what you actually do. With the UAE’s framework overhauled in 2025 and a FATF evaluation on the horizon, examiners are reading these documents closely. Here are the seven mistakes that turn a policy into a finding.
Citing laws that have been repealed
This is the fastest finding of all. The legal foundation has moved twice in recent years, and most template policies haven’t kept up:
- The AML law itself — Federal Decree-Law No. 10 of 2025 (effective 14 October 2025) repealed and replaced Federal Decree-Law 20 of 2018 (as amended by 26/2021 and 7/2024), and added a proliferation-financing framework. A policy citing 20/2018 as the governing law is now behind.
- Beneficial ownership — Cabinet Decision 58/2020 was repealed; UBO procedures now sit under Cabinet Decision 109 of 2023.
- UBO penalties — Cabinet Resolution 53/2021 was replaced by Cabinet Decision 132 of 2023.
The rules those instruments contained (like the 15-working-day UBO update requirement) largely survive — they’ve just been re-anchored to the new law. A policy that cites the old numbers looks, to an examiner, like it was never reviewed.
Getting the CDD scope wrong for real estate brokers
Real estate brokers and agents are DNFBPs (Designated Non-Financial Businesses and Professions), and their CDD rule is stricter than many policies assume: brokers must apply customer due diligence on every purchase/sale transaction they broker — there is no de minimis threshold. The AED 55,000 figure that appears in so many policies is the cash (and virtual-asset) trigger for filing a Real Estate Activity Report (REAR) with the FIU — not a CDD threshold. A policy that only does CDD above AED 55,000 leaves every smaller deal uncovered — direct non-compliance.
Treating CDD as something only “high-risk” customers get
A common drafting error makes CDD conditional — “conducted where the risk rating is medium/high.” Wrong. CDD applies to all customers. The risk rating only decides the depth and monitoring frequency — simplified due diligence (SDD) for lower risk, enhanced due diligence (EDD) for higher risk. As written, low-risk customers get no due diligence at all. Restate it as: CDD always; risk rating sets the intensity.
The PEP “sunset” that doesn’t exist
Many policies declassify a Politically Exposed Person a fixed period — often 12 months — after they leave office. The UAE definition covers persons who are or have been entrusted with prominent public functions, with no automatic expiry. Former-PEP treatment is risk-based only: status continues after office, and any downgrade must come through a documented risk assessment approved by the MLRO — not a calendar.
Wrong citations (and confusion) around STR/SAR and TFS
Suspicious Transaction / Activity Reports and Targeted Financial Sanctions are different obligations under different rules, and policies routinely cross-wire them — for example citing a terrorism-list (TFS) instrument for STR/SAR timelines. STRs/SARs must be filed without delay via goAML; sanctions freezes must be actioned immediately with the relevant report filed in the regulator’s specified window. Internal SLAs (say 24–48 hours) are fine — but the policy must cite the correct legal source and not contradict itself on timing.
An unnamed or over-committed MLRO
Two related governance gaps: the MLRO is left blank in the approval block, and the policy promises the MLRO role “is not combined with any other function.” For a small brokerage that’s often untrue on day one — creating a policy-versus-practice gap an inspector will probe. Name the MLRO, and where roles genuinely overlap, commit to the defensible standard: not combined with conflicting, revenue-generating functions.
Structural and reference errors that signal “never reviewed”
- Missing section headings (a table of contents that lists sections the body doesn’t actually have).
- “Federal Law No. 20 of 2018” where it should read “Federal Decree-Law” — small, but examiners notice.
- Referencing an outdated National Risk Assessment instead of the current National Strategy for AML/CFT/CPF 2024–2027.
The 2026 legal stack your AML policy must reflect
| Area | Current instrument |
|---|---|
| AML/CFT/CPF law | Federal Decree-Law 10 of 2025 + its Executive Regulation (replacing 20/2018) |
| Beneficial ownership | Cabinet Decision 109 of 2023 |
| UBO penalties | Cabinet Decision 132 of 2023 |
| National framework | National Strategy for AML/CFT/CPF 2024–2027 |
Get those right, apply CDD to everyone, fix the broker CDD scope and the PEP rule, name your MLRO — and your policy stops being an inspection risk. If yours still reads like 2021, it’s time for a refresh. (See also our guide to a free-zone AML inspection and remediation.)
Need an AML policy that actually passes inspection?
We create a tailored AML/CFT policy aligned to the current 2025/2026 framework and your activity — or review and fix an existing one that cites repealed laws. From AED 999 + VAT.
How do I know if my UAE AML policy is out of date?
If it cites Federal Decree-Law 20 of 2018 as the governing AML law, or Cabinet Decision 58/2020 or Cabinet Resolution 53/2021 for beneficial ownership, it is out of date. The AML law was replaced by Federal Decree-Law 10 of 2025 (effective 14 October 2025), and UBO now sits under Cabinet Decision 109 of 2023 with penalties under Cabinet Decision 132 of 2023. A policy citing the old instruments is an easy inspection finding.
What laws should a 2026 UAE AML/CFT policy reference?
The current stack: Federal Decree-Law 10 of 2025 and its Executive Regulation (which replaced the 2018 law), Cabinet Decision 109 of 2023 for beneficial ownership, Cabinet Decision 132 of 2023 for UBO penalties, and the National Strategy for AML/CFT/CPF 2024–2027. The policy must also correctly frame CDD, EDD, PEP and STR/SAR obligations for the specific activity.
Do real estate brokers apply CDD on every transaction?
Yes. Real estate brokers and agents are DNFBPs and must apply customer due diligence on every purchase or sale transaction they broker — there is no de minimis threshold. The AED 55,000 figure is the cash and virtual-asset trigger for filing a Real Estate Activity Report with the FIU, not a CDD threshold. A policy that only applies CDD above AED 55,000 is non-compliant.
Does customer due diligence only apply to high-risk customers?
No. CDD is the baseline for all customers. The risk rating determines the depth and monitoring frequency — simplified due diligence for lower-risk and enhanced due diligence for higher-risk customers — not whether CDD is done at all. A policy that only performs CDD for medium or high-risk customers leaves low-risk customers with no due diligence, which is a compliance gap.
Do former PEPs stop being PEPs after 12 months?
No. The UAE definition covers persons who are or have been entrusted with prominent public functions, with no automatic expiry. Former-PEP status continues after they leave office, and any downgrade must be based on a documented, risk-based assessment approved by the MLRO — not a fixed 12-month sunset.
How much does an AML policy cost in the UAE?
Fastlane creates a tailored AML/CFT policy — aligned to the current 2025/2026 legal framework and to your specific activity, such as real estate brokerage — from AED 999 + VAT. We can also review and update an existing policy that cites repealed laws or applies the wrong CDD, PEP or reporting rules.