Key Takeaways
4 insights · 12 min readThe PEP confirmation letter is used when a shareholder is a Politically Exposed Person — the agent confirms it is aware of the PEP status and that the source of wealth is legitimate and verified.
It is the mirror image of the standard letter: instead of certifying “not a PEP”, it certifies the client is a PEP and that Enhanced Due Diligence has been completed.
Its defining requirement is source-of-wealth verification — how the person became wealthy — backed by documents and approved by senior management.
A PEP can form a RAK ICC company; the status simply triggers EDD, and RAK ICC charges a high-risk differential of AED 7,000 (IBC) or AED 8,500 (Foundation).
A RAK ICC PEP confirmation letter is issued by a licensed registered agent when a company’s shareholder is a Politically Exposed Person. On the agent’s letterhead, it confirms that the agent is aware of the client’s PEP status and that the client’s source of wealth is legitimate and has been verified through Enhanced Due Diligence — and it is signed by senior management.
In this guide
What the PEP letter is How it differs from the standard letter What makes someone a PEP Why a PEP needs EDD Source of wealth vs source of funds How source of wealth is verified Senior-management approval Does PEP status ever end? What it costs Getting it wrong How Fastlane helpsWhat is a RAK ICC PEP confirmation letter?
A RAK ICC PEP confirmation letter is a letter on the registered agent’s letterhead, addressed to the Registrar, confirming that a shareholder is a Politically Exposed Person and that the agent has verified the person’s source of wealth as legitimate. It is the document that allows a PEP to be onboarded to a RAK ICC company incorporation the right way — openly, and with the extra checks the law expects.
The letter makes two linked statements. First, that the necessary due diligence has been carried out on the named individual, and that the agent is aware the client is a Politically Exposed Person. Second, that the client’s source of wealth is legitimate and has been verified. It is completed with the signatory’s name, a designation confirming they are senior management, a signature, and the date and stamp.
Two features set it apart from an ordinary onboarding note. It is an acknowledgement rather than a denial — the agent is not saying the client is clean of political exposure, but that it knows about the exposure and has done the deeper work anyway. And it is deliberately signed at senior-management level, because approving a PEP relationship is a decision the standards reserve for senior management, not for junior staff.
How is it different from the standard RAK ICC confirmation letter?
The standard RAK ICC confirmation letter certifies that a shareholder is not a PEP; the PEP confirmation letter is used precisely when that is not true, and adds a verified source-of-wealth statement. Which letter an agent issues depends entirely on the outcome of screening.
In a routine, low-risk case, screening returns no political exposure and the agent issues the standard letter, which also covers criminal-record and sanctions confirmations. Where screening shows the client is a PEP, that standard wording can no longer be signed truthfully — so the agent switches to the PEP confirmation letter, which acknowledges the status and records that Enhanced Due Diligence, in particular source-of-wealth verification, has been completed. The two documents are best understood as two outputs of the same screening process.
| Point of difference | Standard confirmation letter | PEP confirmation letter |
|---|---|---|
| Core statement | Client is not a PEP | Client is a PEP (agent is aware) |
| Level of due diligence | Standard (CDD) | Enhanced (EDD) |
| Source of wealth | Not specifically certified | Certified legitimate & verified |
| Who signs | Authorised signatory | Senior management (required) |
| RAK ICC cost impact | Standard fee | High-risk EDD differential applies |
What makes someone a Politically Exposed Person?
A person is a PEP if they hold, or have held, a prominent public function — and the category is wide enough to catch not just the office-holder but their close circle. The reason political exposure matters is risk: prominent public roles create opportunities for bribery and corruption, so the money attached to them warrants a closer look.
The framework generally distinguishes three groups. A foreign PEP holds a prominent public function in another country. A domestic PEP holds one within the UAE. And a third group covers people entrusted with a prominent function by an international organisation, such as senior officials of supranational bodies. Across all three, the definition reaches immediate family members — spouses, children and parents — and known close associates, because wealth and influence often flow through them.
The practical point for a RAK ICC file is that PEP status is not always obvious from a passport. A shareholder may be the adult child of a serving minister, or a former official whose exposure has not lapsed. Screening exists to surface exactly these connections, and the PEP confirmation letter exists to deal with them properly once they are found.
Why does a PEP need enhanced due diligence?
A PEP triggers Enhanced Due Diligence because international standards and UAE AML rules treat political exposure as a higher money-laundering risk that ordinary checks are not designed to manage. EDD is not a judgement about a particular person; it is a required, standardised response to a risk category.
For a PEP, enhanced due diligence has three defining measures that go beyond standard checks: obtaining senior-management approval before onboarding, taking reasonable steps to establish the source of wealth and source of funds, and conducting enhanced ongoing monitoring of the relationship. The PEP confirmation letter is where the first two are evidenced to the Registrar, and the third continues for as long as the company exists. For the wider set of obligations that sit around this, see our UAE AML compliance service.
What is “source of wealth”, and how is it different from source of funds?
Source of funds is where the specific money in a transaction came from; source of wealth is how the person built their overall wealth in the first place — and for a PEP, it is the source of wealth that must be established and verified. The two are often confused, but the difference is central to a PEP file.
Imagine a shareholder investing AED 500,000 into a new holding company. The source of funds might simply be a transfer from their personal bank account. That tells you almost nothing about whether the underlying wealth is legitimate. The source of wealth asks the harder question: how did this person come to have that money at all — a business they own, a long professional career, an inheritance, an investment portfolio? For a PEP, answering only the first question is not enough.
| Source of funds | Source of wealth | |
|---|---|---|
| Question it answers | Where did this specific money come from? | How was the person’s wealth built overall? |
| Scope | The transaction at hand | The person’s entire financial history |
| Example | Transfer from a named bank account | Ownership of a trading company for 15 years |
| Required for a PEP? | Yes | Yes — and verified |
Onboarding a PEP shareholder?
Tell us how the wealth was built and we’ll tell you exactly which documents RAK ICC will need to verify it — before you apply.
How is a PEP’s source of wealth verified?
Source of wealth is verified with documentary evidence matched to how the wealth arose — not with a simple declaration. The agent’s job is to obtain, review and retain proof that the stated origin of the wealth is real, and to keep that evidence on file to support the confirmation letter.
The evidence depends on the story. Wealth from business ownership is typically supported by audited financial statements, a company valuation or dividend records; wealth from a professional career by employment contracts, payslips or a service record; inherited wealth by a will, grant of probate or estate documents; investment wealth by portfolio and brokerage statements; and wealth from selling an asset, such as property or a business, by the sale and purchase agreement. Where a figure looks implausible for the stated source, that is a red flag the agent must resolve before signing.
| How the wealth arose | Typical verification evidence |
|---|---|
| Business ownership | Audited financial statements, company valuation, dividend records |
| Professional career / salary | Employment contracts, payslips, service record |
| Inheritance | Will, grant of probate, estate documents |
| Investments | Portfolio, brokerage and dividend statements |
| Sale of an asset | Sale & purchase agreement, completion statement |
Who must approve onboarding a PEP, and who signs the letter?
A decision to take on a PEP as a client must be approved by senior management — and it is a senior-management signatory who signs the PEP confirmation letter. This is why the letter’s signature block specifically records the signatory’s designation as senior management.
The requirement is deliberate. Onboarding a PEP is a heightened-risk decision, and the standards place accountability for it at a level that can properly weigh that risk, rather than leaving it to whoever happens to process the file. In practice this means the person who verifies the source of wealth and the person who authorises the relationship should be able to stand behind the confirmation, because the agent — as the AML-regulated party — carries the consequences if the attestation is wrong.
Expert Tip
If you are a PEP, expect and welcome the extra questions. A registered agent that asks for detailed source-of-wealth evidence and routes the decision through senior management is doing its job correctly — and that same rigour is what banks will later rely on when they open the company’s account.
Does someone stop being a PEP after leaving office?
No — PEP status does not switch off automatically the day a person leaves their public role. A risk-based approach applies instead. The question is not the calendar; it is how much residual risk the former position still carries.
International standards are clear that when a customer is no longer entrusted with a prominent public function, the institution should assess the ongoing risk that person presents and apply measures proportionate to it, rather than treating them as no longer a PEP on a fixed date. In practice, many agents and banks continue enhanced monitoring for a period after a person leaves office, and only step it down when the residual risk genuinely falls away. For a RAK ICC company, that means a former-official shareholder may still sit inside the PEP process, and the confirmation letter should reflect the position honestly.
What does it cost to onboard a PEP at RAK ICC?
RAK ICC applies a high-risk differential for Enhanced Due Diligence — AED 7,000 for a high-risk IBC and AED 8,500 for a high-risk Foundation — on top of the standard incorporation fee, with further surcharges for trusts and complex ownership. These are RAK ICC government charges; the agent’s professional fee for the additional work is quoted separately.
| RAK ICC risk-related charge | Applies to | Fee (AED) |
|---|---|---|
| High-risk IBC (enhanced due diligence) | PEP or otherwise high-risk IBC | AED 7,000 |
| High-risk Foundation (enhanced due diligence) | PEP or otherwise high-risk Foundation | AED 8,500 |
| Trust in the structure | Trust as a shareholder / owner | AED 1,750 |
| Complex ownership (3+ levels) | Three or more ownership levels | AED 1,750 |
A worked example makes the impact concrete. Suppose a PEP forms a one-year RAK ICC IBC and holds it directly as an individual: the RAK ICC charges are the AED 3,250 standard fee plus the AED 7,000 EDD differential, for AED 10,250. If instead the PEP holds the company through a trust, add the AED 1,750 trust surcharge, taking the RAK ICC charges to AED 12,000 — again, before the registered agent’s professional fee for the source-of-wealth work.
What are the risks of getting a PEP file wrong?
The two ways to get a PEP file wrong are concealing the status and under-verifying the source of wealth — and both turn a lawful onboarding into a false attestation with real consequences. The PEP process is protective when it is followed and dangerous when it is faked.
If PEP status is hidden and later surfaces, the confirmation on file is false, and both the agent and a client who misled it are exposed. If the status is disclosed but the source of wealth is accepted on thin evidence, the “verified” statement is unsupported and fails at the first serious challenge — from a regulator or from a bank. Under the UAE AML framework, providing false information or failing to meet EDD obligations can attract regulatory penalties and, in serious cases, criminal liability, and RAK ICC itself can impose fines and a late-notification penalty (AED 600 per year) where information is not kept current. Commercially, a discredited PEP file is one of the fastest routes to having a company’s bank account closed.
✓ Do this
- Disclose PEP status — including family and close-associate links — up front
- Provide full source-of-wealth evidence, not just source of funds
- Expect senior-management approval and the EDD fee
- Keep the agent updated if your public role or exposure changes
- Work only through a licensed registered agent
✗ Avoid this
- Hiding or downplaying PEP status to avoid questions
- Offering source of funds where source of wealth is required
- Treating Enhanced Due Diligence as optional or negotiable
- Assuming leaving office ends PEP treatment automatically
- Using an unlicensed intermediary to “simplify” the file
How does Fastlane handle PEP onboarding and the confirmation letter?
Fastlane runs the full Enhanced Due Diligence process for PEP shareholders — confirming status, establishing and verifying source of wealth, routing approval through senior management, and preparing the PEP confirmation letter — so the file stands up to both the Registrar and the bank. As an FTA-registered tax agent and MoE-approved auditor, we hold the documentation to the standard those parties expect.
We handle PEP cases openly and efficiently, and we tell you the fee position at the outset rather than mid-application. Because a RAK ICC company is a UAE juridical person within Corporate Tax scope, we can pair the formation with Corporate Tax registration and our wider AML compliance support, and coordinate onshore alternatives such as a Dubai company setup where a PEP needs a trading presence rather than an offshore holding vehicle.
- Confirm PEP status. We screen every shareholder and beneficial owner and record whether the exposure is foreign, domestic or via an international organisation.
- Establish source of wealth. We map how the client’s wealth was built and identify the evidence that supports each source.
- Verify the evidence. We review and retain audited financials, employment records, inheritance or sale documents, and assess legitimacy.
- Obtain senior-management approval. A senior-management signatory approves the relationship and signs the PEP confirmation letter.
- Monitor on an enhanced basis. We apply closer ongoing monitoring and notify the Registrar immediately of any relevant change.
Fastlane Tax Team
FTA-registered tax agents and MoE-approved auditors advising on UAE company formation, AML compliance and enhanced due diligence. RAK ICC fee figures referenced here are taken from the official RAK ICC Fee Schedule effective 1 January 2026.
Ask the team a question